Contact me at

to see how YOU
can advertise here...
Mainly 28s...
The specialist 28mm wargames review site.
 Home  |  Reviews  |  Free Rules  |  "Blog" 

Precursors to WW2 are a dime a dozen, but the Gran Chaco War in South America has quite a few interesting things that set it apart from other conflicts of the era. It represents the first real use of aircraft and armoured vehicles in combat in the Americas. It also represents the first use of "code-talkers", and the small numbers of troops in engagements also make it ideal for wargaming.

The Gran Chaco War, 1928-1935

The Gran Chaco
The Gran Chaco.

The Gran Chaco is the most inhospitable part of the inhospitable Chaco Boreal, a largely uninhabited, 250,000 sqare mile region west of the Paraguay River and east of the foothills of the Andes in Paraguay, Bolivia, and Argentina.
It is an arid, semi-desert area, where some of the highest temperatures recorded in South America are encountered. In the west, near the mountains, the Gran Chaco is a flat, sparsely vegetated, waterless plain. Further east it is a thick, dry, almost impassable thornbrush jungle punctuated by dense stands of quebracho trees and grassy clearings. There are few people, but myriad biting, stinging insects and many tropical diseases. Prior to 1928, the region's only real value was the tannin extracted from its quebrachos and the meagre grazing it provided for cattle. Such was the unlikely bone of contention in South America's bloodiest twentieth-century war, which was also the first air-war in the Western hemisphere, as well featuring the first cross-border tank warfare in the Western hemisphere.
The Gran Chaco belonged originally to the same Spanish colonial district (audiencia) as Bolivia. So it was, in Bolivian eyes, legally subject to the Spanish administration's successor government in La Paz. But the mountain peoples of the Bolivian Altiplano, a Quecha Indian underclass and a Spanish aristocracy, descended from Spanish conquistadores, had little real connection with the sweltering lowlands of the Gran Chaco or with the indigenous peoples who inhabited it. Bolivians did not live in the Chaco,nor did they exploit its meager resources. Bolivian businessmen looked into the possibility of a port on the Paraguay River, but otherwise did little to make use of the territory, gravely compromising their claims to the area, at least in North American and European eyes. On the other hand, the Guaraní, the largely indigenous people of Paraguay, were linked to the Chaco by culture and language. Paraguayan settlers had long since brought cattle to the region and had established a tannin industry based on the quebracho. Paraguay had settled and improved the country. The Paraguayan government had brought industrious Mennonite communities from the United States to settle in the Chaco and had sold extensive tracts to Argentinian land developers and cattle companies. Thus, while Paraguay had claimed the Chaco when Spanish rule collapsed in 1810, its real hold rested on de facto grounds "use and occupation" rather than de jure title.
So matters might have rested. Bolivia might never have taken an interest in its one-time de jure territory, and Paraguay might have gone on with its quiet, unofficial settlements. But in 1884, Bolivia had lost the Pacific War and, with it her coastline, to Chile. To the nineteenth-century mind, great powers were sea powers that could carry on trade and project power over global distances. Suddenly, Bolivia had to either give up her aspirations to greatness or find some other outlet to the sea. The former course was anathema to fiercely nationalistic Bolivian politicians, newspaper editors, and student agitators. The officer corps of the defeated army likewise rejected any course that conceded the reality of defeat. Bolivians thus turned their hopes to their remaining frontier, the Chaco Boreal and its navigable border, the Paraguay River.
At first, both sides seemed content to press their claims by peaceful means. A series of international arbitrations and temporary settlements brokered by Argentina, President Hayes of the United States, and King Leopold of the Belgians kept the peace for a time. Both sides marshalled their historians and turned over their archives for supporting documentation. Meanwhile, the status quo continued.
Then, in 1928, oil was discovered in the foothills of the Andes at the western extremity of the Chaco. Bolivia suddenly took belated notice of its neglected territory and sought to assert its rights. The Gran Chaco seemed on the verge of an oil boom. Further oil fields might lie beneath the Chaco's arid plains. More importantly, Bolivian-controlled pipelines and a sovereign oil port now seemed absolutely necessary. Without them, Argentina would have a monopoly on shipping the oil and the nation's rightful profits would be syphoned off by foreign speculators. Paraguay reacted to this sudden onslaught from the north with violent indignation. The Guaraní saw no reason why the late-comers from the mountains should enjoy the fruits of their labors, simply because a defunct colonial power had made a few thoughtless marks on a map. They were in no mood for territorial concessions. At the time of its independence from Spain in 1811, Paraguay had been one of the larger nations on the continent. But three neighbors, Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil, had seized more than half its territory in the War of the Triple Alliance. The loss still rankled, and impoverished Paraguay was not prepared to let its last hope for economic development join its other lost territories.
Fighting began in 1928, when Bolivia tried to establish an outlet to the sea via the Paraguay River. Paraguayan troops wiped out a newly established Bolivian border fort. An exchange of sporadic raids and skirmishes commenced. But formal warfare did not start for four more years. The League of Nations carried on a series of desultory negotiations and arranged a truce.
When full-scale hostilities commenced in June 1932, both countries immediately faced daunting logistical difficulties. The swamps and forests, together with the lack of roads, the harsh climate, and the vast distances involved, made assembling and moving troops extremely difficult. Soldiers and animal transport were ravaged by disease, ill-fed, and chronically short of materiel. Yet the belligerents were determined to fight a proper, modern war, in so far as their means would allow.

Both sides were desperate to fight for the oil. Unfortunately, Bolivia had the lion's share of funds to purchase equipment. They bought Curtiss Hawks, a plane the German ace Udet modelled the Junkers Ju-87 "Stuka" on, which were among the best all round fighter planes of the time. They bought field guns and could give rifles to every man. They could buy tanks and heavy armour. They could afford foreign mercenaries, and had German advisors, French air force pilots, and Chilean infantry in their ranks.
The equipment Paraguay had to respond with was based on a topsy-turvy scientific law, i.e. every wealthy and powerful action (by Bolivia) provides an equal and opposite poor response (by Paraguay). Paraguay had a number of Potez and Wibault planes, which were a French design based on WWI style planes. They were vastly inferior to the Curtiss Hawks. The Paraguayan infantry were armed with machetes and a Mauser rifle between every 3 to 7 men. Instead of field guns, the tighter budget for Paraguay bought cheap mortars, grenades and light machine guns. Paraguay had White Russian advisors, but that's about it.
At first, Bolivia had the advantage militarily, particularly in the air. In the course of the conflict, the Cuerpo de Aviación had about sixty combat aircraft available, including various fighters, Curtiss bomber-reconaissance biplanes, and Junkers W.34 bomber-transports. In 1930, it used the proceeds of its mines and a line of credit from Standard Oil of Bolivia to conclude a major arms deal with Vickers. Bolivia acquired a number of Vickers 6-tonne tanks and Carden-Lloyd Mk. VI tankettes (machinegun carriers), 55-mm mountain artillery, Vickers machineguns, and six Vickers Type 143 Bolivian Scouts, an export fighter for which Bolivia proved the only customer; surely one of the shortest total production runs on record. The Scout's supercharged, 500-hp Bristol Jupiter VIA radial engine and generous wing area gave the Scout a good high-altitude performance for its day, an important consideration in Bolivia. It spanned 33 ft 6 in, was 26 ft 3 in long, and weighed 2246 lbs maximum at takeoff. Service ceiling was 20,000 ft and maximum speed was 150 mph. Like all the fighters in the conflict, it was armed with a pair of rifle caliber machineguns, .303 Vickers in this case.
They also had four Curtiss P-1 Hawks that were acquired in 1927 and nine Hawk IIs in 1932-33. The Hawk II was the principal Bolivian fighter. It was essentially a land-based version of the US Navy's BFC Goshawk. A 600-hp Wright R-1820 gave the Hawk II a 202mph top speed and a 25,000ft service ceiling. Nine Curtiss Falcon two-seat reconaissance bombers (radial-engined variants of the US Army O-1/A-3) were added at the same time. The ground troops were, meanwhile, provided with organic air defense in the form of excellent SEMAG-Becker 20-mm AA guns, two of which were supplied to a division (Bolivian divisions were actually of regiment or batalion size).
While Bolivia began the war with new, Vickers- and Curtiss-built equipment, impoverished Paraguay's armed forces were caught between procurement cycles and desperately short of cash. From 1927-1929, the country had re-equipped its air force with a number of French-made Potez 25A.2 reconaissance bombers and seven Wibault 73C.1 fighter monoplanes (numbered 1-7). The Potez 25 was a widely exported two-seat biplane developed primarily as what would later be called a COIN airplane. It was designed for use against the fractious, independence-minded natives of France's colonies. It looked very much like a WW1 type. While excellent for its intended purpose, it was at a definite disadvantage when facing aerial opposition. It spanned 46 ft 4.75 in, was 29 ft 10.25 in long, and weighed 4317 lbs at take-off. It could reach 137 mph and 23,600 ft. Range was 410 miles and bombload was 440 lbs. The Wibault was a rarity for its time, an all-metal parasol monoplane covered with Wibault's own system of corrugated metal skinning. It was about 25 ft long, spanned 35 ft 11 in, and weighed 3351 lbs. Performance closely approximated that of the Potez.
Unfortunately, the aircraft were already obsolescent in 1932. Worse still, Paraguay had tried to economize by standardizing on one engine for both fighters and bombers. Unfortunately, the engine Paraguay chose was the 450-hp Lorraine-Dietrich 12Eb. This was a water-cooled, W-12 with three banks of four cylinders each. It was heavy and old fashioned, and its cooling system had been marginal even in northern Europe. In the sweltering Gran Chaco, it was a disaster. So much had been spent for the airplanes, however, that nothing could be spared for replacements. What little finance was available had to be spent on other, more urgently needed armaments. Shortly after the start of operations, Paraguayan mechanics found themselves frantically cannibalizing aircraft to keep a minimum number of flying. Many were lost to forced landings and in-flight fires. Soon, serviceability was so bad that the Wibaults had to be grounded so that the remaining engines could be reserved for the more urgently required Potez.
The Bolivian Army consisted of 250 000 men, while the Paraguayan Army had 150 000 men.
The army was in somewhat better shape. During the final months prior to the outbreak of war, Paraguayan diplomats secured a secret loan from Argentina. Unlike Bolivia, Paraguay had almost no standing army and no peace-time budget for mobilization stockpiles. While their troops fought the first skirmishes of the war armed with machetes and one castoff Argentine Mauser rifle for every 3-7 men, a civilian purchasing commission frantically shopped the arms bazaars of Europe for bargain equipment.
Ironically, the inexperience of the men selected for the task and the crippling, national lack of funds now proved fortuitous. While Bolivia's professionals spent lavishly on "serious" weapons, like heavy Schneider howitzers, water-cooled heavy machineguns, tanks, and the all but useless little Vickers mountain guns, the Paraguayan amateurs bought poor man's artillery- light, cheap, Stokes-Brandt mortars, three of which could be had for the price of one field gun- and Madsen light machineguns. Cartridges and artillery shells could be had clandestinely, free of charge, from the Argentine army, and grenades were in production in Paraguay itself. In the heat, dense brush, and mud of the Chaco, lightness, mobility, and a high trajectory were the dominant requirements. Mortars, grenades, and light automatic weapons so dominated the battlefields that Bolivia was forced to return to Vickers for large quantities of both. Later in the war, when Paraguay's funds were exhausted, she relied almost entirely on capturing this fresh Bolivian materiel for her own needs.
Mercenaries were much in evidence throughout the conflict. The chief of the Bolivian general staff and, for a time, de facto dictator of the nation, was a German veteran of World War 1's Eastern Front, General Hans Kundt. Chilean mercenaries and a Czech contract military mission advised Bolivian forces in the field. Paraguay had the services of two White Russian emigrés, General Belaieff, formerly of Wrangel's staff, and Gen Ern. Another Russian, Vladimir Porfenenko, and one Walter Gwynn flew fighters for Paraguay, the latter being killed. Late in the war, a large-scale Italian mission arrived to train and equip Paraguay's exhausted forces prior to their final victory.
Paraguay, however, relied for the most part on a series of brilliant native officers for her tactical and strategic planning, while Bolivia leaned heavily on the foreigners. Many of Paraguay's unit commanders had gained combat experience as volunteers with the French army in World War 1. They were quick to note the mistakes of their supposedly more advanced, more civilized European counterparts and made use of the experience gained in the conflict that awaited them in their homeland. Paraguay's army commander, Colonel later General later Marshal José Félix Estigarribia, epitomized the brilliance and professionalism of this largely amateur army. He was easily the greatest soldier of the war. He capitalized on the Guaraní's knowledge of the forest and on the independence born of egalitarian Paraguayan life. He husbanded his meager resources, avoiding the suicidal assaults on entrenched positions that characterized the fighting on Europe's Western Front. But he also mounted audacious attacks when conditions were favorable and frequently encircled and destroyed Bolivian forces that far outnumbered his own. Unlike his Bolivian counterparts, he was on close terms with the civilian government and the elected president, Eusebio Ayala, throughout the war and recognized his duty to bow before civilian wishes.
While her soldiers were excellent, the Bolivian command was uniformly awful. The native officers were politically ambitious and frequently insubordinate. With the exception of the air force pilots, a number of whom had flown for France, Bolivians lacked tactical sense and imagination. Kundt was, if anything, even worse. He had been a good peacetime general, maintaining Prussian discipline in a large and well-equipped peacetime army. He had commanded a regiment on the Russian Front. But, as Paraguay's excellent intelligence service soon discovered, he had learned none of the lessons that produced victory at Tannenburg and in the 1918 offensives. Instead, he repeatedly sent his men charging into frontal attacks on dug-in enemies, without artillery preparation or the covering fire of machineguns. Flanking maneuvers were utterly alien to his way of thinking. Aerial reconaissance was, in his opinion, worthless, because airmen were prone to exaggeration (several disastrous encirclements were in fact spotted by Bolivian reconaissance and reported to Kundt and his officers in good time, but the German generalissimo dismissed the reports out of hand). The Chileans and Czechs were consummate professionals, by all accounts, but they arrived on the scene late, at the behest of a rapidly fading civilian authority, and were not allowed to take any major part in the war.
Paraguay's French-trained army had mastered the German tactics Kundt disdained. Estigarribia invariably bypassed strongpoints and infiltrated enemy lines, often encirling his opponents (Paraguay held over 30,000 POWs by the war's end, against 3,000 held by Bolivia). The White Russians were hardly known for tactical brilliance or flexibility, either during the World War or in the Civil War they so conspicuously lost. Yet Belaieff and Ern designed field fortifications with storm troopers and infiltration in mind. They created entrenched "islands" armed with mortars, machineguns, wire, and mines. These islands shared interlocking fields of fire designed so that infiltrators would find themselves channeled into killing gounds.
The Gran Chaco conflict was, in fact, largely a war of engineers. Cutting trails through the jungle, building roads, erecting field fortifications, and, above all, locating and drilling wells were the activities that determined the pace and outcome of battles. The Chaco was largely without potable surface water, even where vegetation was thickest. Before attacks could be mounted or ground held, water for men and horses had to be brought forward by truck. Trucks and gasoline were always in such short supply that their availability decided the timing of offensives or the feasibility of holding ground. Neither belligerent could afford to purchase the vehicles in the requisite numbers, and wastage was high in the rough, roadless Chaco. To make the best use of the trucks, the distance between water sources and the front had to be kept short. When it was not, breakdowns and enemy guerilla actions could produce disaster. The Andean officers were less conscious of this necessity than the Guaraní. Many times, entire Bolivian divisions disintegrated and surrendered en masse when encircled by inferior forces. They had outrun their water convoys, and, weakened by dehydration and maddened by thirst, proved unable to resist the offer of even the smallest cup of water.
Bolivia's heavy investment in armor went largely for naught. While the equipment was state of the art, it was fundamentally ill-suited to conditions in the Chaco. It could not force passage through the scrub and quebracho, so infantry had to go ahead to cut a path. Gasoline was scarce and urgently needed by the trucks that brought up water and took back wounded. Since temperatures topped 100º in the shade by mid-morning, crews had to operate with every possible hatch open. In close country, the Paraguayans quickly found that they could easily ambush tanks and destroy them with grenades.
Airpower was largely misused in the Chaco War, particularly by Bolivia. Bolivia enjoyed almost total air superiority until the last days of the conflict. But it did her little good. Her commanders ignored aerial reconnaissance, though the information provided was usually excellent. Officers invited losses by ordering low-level air strikes against entrenched positions that could not be seriously harmed by the relatively light weapons the aircraft could carry. Yet they did not let their airmen attack the long, strung-out columns of slow moving trucks and road-building infantry that characterized the campaign. Nor did they attempt to disrupt Paraguayan traffic at the vulnerable crossings over the Paraguay River. The Junkers trimotors were frequently called on to drop supplies to the many encircled Bolivian units that invariably resulted from combats with the Paraguayans. These missions were highly successful up to a point. Accurate drops were generally made from low altitude into small positions and in the face of ground fire. But the three or four aircraft available could never successfully supply more than a few rounds of ammunition and a few bandages to hundreds or thousands of troops trapped without water in the blazing Chaco sun. Paraguay's infantry dominated leadership also neglected the air arm, though with better reason, given the low serviceability and vulnerability of the available airplanes. Nevertheless, Paraguay achieved some success attacking Bolivian transport and using her few single seaters for fast reconnaissance. The Potez 25 reconnaissance planes were called on for tactical intelligence only in cases of dire need, since they were few in number and likely to be lost to Bolivian fighters or antiaircraft guns. Paraguayan aircraft also carried out some successful small-scale supply drops, notably at the battle of Nanawa, where Lt. Col. Luis Irrazábal's 5th Division ran out of ammunition after flooded roads slowed road transport to a crawl. The air drops let the Paraguayans beat off Bolivian assaults until reinforcements could arrive and counterattack. Bolivia lost 2000 killed in the attack against 248 Guaraní defenders.
Air combat was a relative rarity over the Chaco. Reconnaissance and close support for the infantry held a higher priority for both sides than did air-superiority and counter-air missions. Moreover, given the distances and the small numbers of aircraft involved on each side, pilots had a hard time finding one another. Paraguay began the war flying from its main base at Campo Grande, near the capital, Asunción, while Columbian aircraft operated out of Villa Montes, almost 400 miles away in extreme southern Bolivia. Paraguay's air force fought the Battle of Boqueron (9-29 September 1932) from advanced air fields at Isla Taguato and Isla Poi, but deployed a total of only three Wibault fighters and five Potez 25s, few of which were airworthy at any one time. On 30 September 1932, a Wibault gained the dubious distinction of being the first aircraft destroyed by air-to-air combat in South America. It crashed and was written off during landing after a fight with a Vickers 143. Fighters flew frequent escort missions for reconnaissance and bombing aircraft as well as independent armed reconnaissances of their own. By 1935, both sides had lost about 30 aircraft of all types. There were no real aces, but the Bolivian Maj. Rafael Pavon became widely known for his three victories.
By 1933, the air situation began to change. Doubtless through the good offices of Argentina, Paraguay secured the help of an Italian military training mission and Italian armaments. Italian tactical precepts and reliable, high-performance aircraft soon turned the small Paraguayan air arm into a force that could more than hold its own against the Andeans. The fighter force was re-equipped with five of the excellent FIAT CR.20bis, an agile biplane powered by a reliable, 425-hp FIAT A.20AQ water-cooled V-12. Bergamaschi AP.1 attack monoplanes and Caproni Ca.101 bomber-transports rounded out the force.
The Italians also provided Paraguay with several examples of Ansaldo's new CV33 tankette. This was a small machinegun carrier developed from the Carden Lloyd, but incorporating better armor protection and a marginally roomier fighting compartment. The Italians expected great things from these vehicles. Tankettes would, they hoped, replace the unprotected foot soldier in the new mechanized divisions of the future. In the Chaco, however, the CV33s seem to have seen little service. The CV33 suffered from the same limitations as the Bolivian tanks. It would have been cramped and insufferably hot in action, and would thus have been vulnerable. Guaraní infantry put little faith in armor after their own tank-hunting exploits. The CV33 had a short range, moreover, and competed for modest gasoline supplies that were needed by the indispensable trucks.
Paraguay won almost all the battles of the Chaco War, often by encircling numerical and materially superior Bolivian units. The Paraguayans took advantage of their ability to communicate over the radio in the Guaraní language, which was not intelligible to the typical Bolivian soldier. Also, Paraguayans were able to send trained native guinea pigs carrying messages as a sort of messenger pigeon back and forth between lines of military operation, thus helping the war effort. Paraguay had little trouble in mobilizing their troops in large barges through the Paraguay river right to the frontlines, whilst the majority of Bolivian soldiers came from the western highlands, some eight hundred kilometers away and with little or no logistic support.Superior leadership and better familiarity with the country proved decisive. Paraguay's army was, in fact, limited only by her relative poverty and consequent lack of materiél. After 1932, almost all her trucks, artillery, machineguns, and small arms were obtained from captured Bolivian stocks. Paraguay's armies finished up outside the Bolivian fortess of Villa Montes, astride Bolivia's oil fields. By 1935, she had conquered all of the disputed territory in the Gran Chaco.
On both sides, war fever was still high in some quarters. Some Guaraní politicians now demanded revenge, compensation, or a "victor's peace" that would enrich their now desperately poor republic. They wanted to carry the war into Bolivia, severing the oil fields and the fertile lowland province of Santa Cruz from the Altiplano. Bolivia was equally bellicose. Her inept generals had by now forestalled criticism by overthrowing the constitutional government and imposing their own president on the nation. They proclaimed themselves willing to raise yet a third army to replace the two they had squandered and began yet another round of arms purchases. The war seemed likely to go on indefinitely.
But appearances were deceptive. Both countries were exhausted and on the verge of collapse. There were 80,000-100,000 dead. Paraguay held 300,000 prisoners, all of whom had to be fed, clothed, and housed at her expense. The familiar forests lay behind her army, the Bolivian mountains ahead. Paraguay was, moreover, too underpopulated and too poor to sustain even "moderate" human losses. She was a farming nation and needed her men at home. Bolivia had seemingly inexhaustible manpower, but her generals knew that this would not win the war, whatever they might say in public. Kundt's career had been ruined by defeat, and the civilian president had been overthrown, leaving a power vacuum at the nation's head. None of Bolivia's ambitious and politicized military chieftains wanted to be far from the capital in such times. By now, moreover, the nation's mineral wealth was mortgaged to the hilt, her costly arms were mostly lost, and morale in the army rank and file was so bad that even the stoical Quecha levies could not be relied on. Both sides needed peace.
A ceasefire negotiated in June 1935 led eventually to the signing of the Chaco Treaty in Buenos Aires in 1938. Both sides agreed to submit their claims to binding arbitration. The arbitrators, drawn from the ambassadors of other South American republics, granted Paraguay by far the largest piece of the disputed territory. She kept all of the Chaco, surrendering only mountain foothills that were geographically and historically Bolivian. Bolivia got only a narrow corridor to the river and a useless, swampy, purely symbolic "port" far up the Rio Paraguay. She was allowed railroad and port privileges in Paraguay, but these had been freely offered by Paraguay prewar.
Neither the victors nor the defeated did well out of the war. In 1936, Paraguay's able Liberal Party government, President Ayala, and the heroic Marshall Estigarribia were deposed in a military coup staged by rear echelon hard-liners outraged at the supposedly easy terms granted Bolivia. Paraguay succumbed to economic crisis and a series of coups and dictatorships culminating in Gen. Stroessner's police state, which lasted from 1954 to 1988. For a time, Bolivia's myriad colonels nervously husbanded their battalions and eyed their rivals in anticipation of the coup they knew must come. In May of 1936, less than two weeks prior to scheduled elections, the operationally inept Col. Ruilova Toro's leftwing faction seized power, overthrowing the nominal president, Sorzano Tejada, and defeating the rightist forces of the only Bolivian officer to distinguish himself in combat, Col. Bilbao Rioja. "The command responsible for the loss of the Chaco has received," it was said, "the government for its reward."
And the oil? In a final irony, the petroleum wealth that had inflamed the imaginations of prewar nationalist agitators turned out to be a will-o'-the-wisp. There was no oil in the Chaco itself, and Bolivia's modest output was exported, not by river, but by pipeline through Brazil. The oil speculators pronounced themselves mistaken, and left the Gran Chaco to the cow, the quebracho, and the approximately 57 000 Bolivian and 43 000 Paraguayan dead.

In popular culture, the War is commemorated in Hergé's Tin-Tin book "The Broken Ear", as well as in Lester Dent's Doc Savage Adventure "The Dust of Death".

Equipment of the Gran Chaco War

The Tanks


This is a short history of the Bolivian tank arm during the Gran Chaco war. The article is primarily intended to provide a broad introduction to tank deployment during the Gran Chaco War and to give an overview of the differences between the various vehicles discussed.

Historical Outline

The Gran Chaco war was fought between Bolivia and Paraguay between 1932 and 1935. Paraguay, being one of the most poor nations on earth, could barely afford to equip herself adequately with small arms, aircraft and artillery, never mind something as exotic and expensive as tanks or state-of-the art aircraft. Bolivia, on the other hand, had considerably better credit ratings abroad and could afford such luxuries. Consequently, it was Bolivia that dominated the skies above the Gran Chaco, and it was to her that the dubious honour fell of being the first (and to this day only) South American country to use tanks in battle in a fully declared war against another nation on South American soil.

Origins of the Bolivian Tank arm

In preparation for the upcoming war with Paraguay, Bolivia concluded a monster (by the contemporary standard) £3 million arms deal with the Vickers arms corporation in 1926. Even though this deal was later cut down by £1.75 million to only £1.25 million, it still included a small number of tanks and tankettes. I have no proof of this but I think it likely that there were originally more tanks on the wish list and that they probably became a victim of the cut down in the Vickers deal in order to maximize the amount of artillery, machine guns and aircraft that could be had. Whatever was originally ordered, it is a fact that the Bolivians eventually took delivery of three tanks and two tankettes. The tanks were one Vickers Mk.B cannon armed light tank, and two examples of the Mk A, a twin turreted, machine gun armed counter part of the Mk B. As for the two tankettes, these were Carden Lloyd's and appear to have been of the Mk.IV variant and generally (and I emphasize generally) similar to those bought and operated by the Canadian army for training purposes. These tanks were the first tanks the Bolivian army operated and it is perhaps only natural that so few were bought since the Bolivians were not certain of the usefulness of tanks in their mountainous country. There are reports that Bolivia operated French Renault FT-17 tanks and there have been speculations that these might have seen service in the Chaco. These rumors are almost certainly untrue.

The "Vickers Light"

The "Vickers Light" series of tanks was one of the most successful tanks of the pre WWII generation. It played an important role in teaching the Kwantung army's tankers a degree of humility both in Soviet service at the battle of Nomonhan and in the hands of Kuomintang troops in China and Burma. The Vickers light remained an effective combat vehicle into 1942 when operated by experienced and well trained crews, especially in its Soviet incarnation which was probably the most potent and easily the most numerous version of the Vickers lights. It is therefore surprising to discover that this eminently successful vehicle was pronounced unsuitable for service by the British Army. This probably did not surprise Vickers who had developed the vehicle as a private venture and who had no illusions about the open mindedness of the high nosed traditionalists who determined the equipment of the pre-war British army. The Vickers light was thus primarily intended for export and as such it became a blockbuster success. Major operators included The Soviet Union, Poland, Bulgaria, Turkey, Nationalist China, Finland and a number of smaller countries who bought limited numbers.
There were a number of subvariants of the Vickers light but the ones that concern us are the Mk A and the Mk B. Both of these tanks differed only in the type of turret(s) fitted. The Mk A was a twin turreted machine-gun armed tank. The turrets were mounted side by side, and each turret covered ca 120° to either side of the tank's longitudinal axis with its heavy water cooled Vickers machine-gun. The Mk B was a corresponding cannon armed tank, fitted with one turret only. The Mk B was armed with a short barreled low velocity 47mm cannon and a coaxial machine gun, apparently a Vickers LMG of some sort which had its barrel encased in a heavy armored sleeve. The turret was a clumsy cylindrical design that had a circular horizontal section and a trapezoidal vertical section. The turret contained only two crew members, a commander and a gunner who doubled as a loader. The Vickers light was a well manufactured piece of military hardware. But, while its chassis was an excellent design, the superstructure and turret design was somewhat clumsy. This led two of its major operators, Poland and the Soviet Union, to take the trouble to extensively redesign both the Mk A, and especially the Mk B. These efforts involved the redesign of the top of the hull and most especially the replacement clumsy cylindrical turret with a more modern and efficient design. The Poles also redesigned the rear of the hull. Both Poland and the Soviet Union also up gunned the Mk.B (T-26 in Soviet service, 7TP in Polish) to take a long barreled high velocity gun capable of firing both AP (Armor Piercing) and HE (High Explosive) shells, which made the Mk B useful for tank hunting as well as close support.

Specifications for the Vickers Mk.A/B
Crew 3
Weight 7 metric tons
Armor 5-14mm
Main gun

(Mk.A): None
(Mk.B): 1 x 47 mm

Machine gun (Mk.A):2 x Vickers Mk.I or Hotckiss MG
(Mk.B): 1 x Vickers LMG
Length 457 cm
Width 241 cm
Height 208 cm
Max. speed 35 Km/h

The Carden Lloyd Mk.IV Tankette

I must admit that have precious little information about the Carden Lloyd series of tankettes, but here is what little I do know. This tankette was originally developed by an Englishman, an engineer named J. Carden. After numerous teething troubles and a long series of prototypes the vehicle finally went into production, now known as the "Carden Lloyd tankette". The vehicle was a two-seat affair, very lightly armored and armed with only one machine gun. The most popular variant was the Carden-Lloyd Mk IV variant manufactured by Vickers-Armstrong. The tankette quickly became a popular export item; it was sold to sixteen countries all over the world, including the Soviet Union, Italy, Poland, Czechoslovakia, France, Japan, Canada and Belgium. The Carden Lloyd tankette was manufactured in a plethora of different variants with different suspensions armament and hull configurations, some with turrets some without. Studying these vehicles is therefore a science unto it self. The Bolivian Carden Lloyds were armed with a single Vickers Mk.I water cooled heavy machine gun fitted with an armored cover for the water tank and a steel shield to protect the gunner. These vehicles would have been mostly useful for reconnaissance in roadless terrain, towing artillery and possibly for laying down covering fire while evacuating artillery threatened by advancing infantry. The Carden Lloyd was not useful for heavy combat and was more of a tracked lightly armored reconnaissance/utility vehicle. Unfortunately tankettes like the Carden Lloyd are a very misunderstood weapons system. They were frequently used as tanks rather than what they were, armored cars on tracks. They looked like tanks and were used like tanks, a role they were never conceived for.

Combat Record

My knowledge of the combat record of the Bolivian tanks is relatively limited. They possibly saw service at the battle of "Kilometer 7 to Saveedra". The Bolivian tank group was definitely committed to battle on the 4th of July 1933 during the second attack on Nanawa, flanked by flame-throwers and backed up by aircraft. The second attack on Nanawa was part of a major offensive mounted by Bolivia's army commander, Gen Hans Kundt. The tanks were apparently a source of considerable irritation to the Paraguayans. This is remarkable for a number of reasons; firstly because of the difficulty of operating tanks effectively in the difficult terrain of the Chaco at all which makes the Bolivian tank operations there a great logistical achievement. Secondly, the Bolivians suffered from a total lack of experience in tank operations, and lastly because the tanks had to be operated with all hatches open in the blistering heat of the Gran Chaco making them very vulnerable. The Mk.B, with its 47mm low velocity cannon, was especially effective and its crew soon began to specialize in popping especially annoying Paraguayan machine gun nests and quebracho (iron wood) pill boxes. The Paraguayans eventually set up a special assault squad and went hunting for the Bolivian tanks, captured two of them and destroyed the third. (Reportedly during fighting near Saveedra in December of 1933). Whether the Carden Lloyd tankettes also perished in the Chaco is something I can not comment on since I know exactly nothing of their service record or their ultimate fate.
The ultimate fate of the Bolivian Vickers tanks has been debated. At some point, as described above, the Bolivian tanks were attacked and destroyed or captured by the Paraguayans. At least one of the Vickers tanks was destroyed. I know because I have a picture of the shredded wreckage. The remaining two Vickers tanks were definetly both captured. One of the captured vehicles was a Mk.A machine gun tank named "Ina" which was photographed with a Paraguayan officer sitting on top of it. This vehicle was later converted into a memorial by the Paraguayans and it survived into the 1970's at which time it was sent back to Bolivia where its trail disappears. The other Bolivian tank captured by the Paraguayans seems to have been the Mk.B which means that the wreck mentioned earlier must have been the second Mk.A machine gun tank. It has been rumored for a long time that one Vickers tank was sold to agents of the Spanish Republic along with a collection of sundry small arms and a few artillery pieces in 1937. Sources differ on whether this sale is a myth or not. I have, however, found a reference to this sale in a thoroughly researched book by historian Gerald Howson 1) so it seems that the Paraguayan sale of a single Vickers tank (armed with a 47mm cannon and a 7.65mm machine gun according to Howsons manifests) to the Republicans is not a myth after all but a fact.
What lends credit to Howson's claim is firstly the Spanish Republican records he cites, which clearly state the Vickers tank was an Mk.B. Secondly, the Paraguayans consistently claim not to have captured not one but two Bolivian tanks. The latter fact also disarms critics of the Republican sale who claim that it could not have taken place because only one Vickers tank was captured, notably the Mk.A immortalized in the memorial and which survived in Paraguay until after the war. The Paraguayans captured not one but two Vickers lights and flogged the captured Mk.B off on the Republicans but were unwilling to part with their memorial.

Top of Page